Supreme Court of the United States
Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council
June 22, 2009557 U.S. 261
Summary
The Supreme Court held that the Army Corps of Engineers, not the EPA, has authority to permit the discharge of mining slurry as fill material under §404 of the Clean Water Act. The Court further held that the Corps acted in accordance with law because EPA new source performance standards do not apply to discharges regulated under §404, deferring to the agencies' reasonable interpretation. Justice Ginsburg, dissenting, would have affirmed the Ninth Circuit, arguing that the Clean Water Act mandates adherence to EPA pollution-control requirements for new sources.
Holding
- Agency authority to permit slurry discharge. The Corps, not the EPA, has authority to permit the slurry discharge under §404 because slurry is defined as fill material.
- Lawfulness of permit regarding EPA new source performance standards. The Corps acted in accordance with law because EPA new source performance standards do not apply to discharges of fill material regulated under §404.
Docket 07-984
Cited authorities
Cited by
- Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Center for Biological Diversity, and Klamath Forest Alliance v. National Oceanic…
- Intermountain Insurance Service of Vail, Limited Liability Company, Thomas A. Davies, Tax Matters Partner V…
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Nellina Guerrera
- Idaho Conservation League v. Poe
- Friends of Animals v. the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
- New Mexico Health Connections, a New Mexico Non-Profit Corporation v. United States Department of Health and Human…
- Wildearth Guardians, Oregon Wild, the Sierra Club, and Great Old Broads for Wilderness v. Shane Jeffries
- Eastern Oregon Mining Association Guy Michael and Charles Chase v. Department of Environmental Quality Dick…